Date:	Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:58:40 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Tobias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ro=DFmann?= <t DOT rossmann AT gmx DOT at>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Legal `restrictions' of the STL
In-Reply-To:	<25972.946912903@www11.gmx.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000104105823.26733D-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Tobias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ro=DFmann?= wrote:

> The FAQ (2.11) says, that it is enough to mention the BSD copyright

Even this is not required anymore: as of July 1999, BSD withdrew the
wording that made this mandatory.

> If I don't misunderstand the notice below, it is
> also required to mention SGI's and HP's copyright in the docs, if the STL
> is used.

You don't get the SGI's and HP's versions of the STL, at least not in
gppNNNb.zip.  What you get is the GNU version of the standard C++
library, which includes a certain implementation of the STL.  As the
FAQ explains in section 19.1, this library (libstdcxx.a) doesn't bring
your application under any restrictions, except if you compile your
program with a compiler other than GCC (which won't happen as long as
you use DJGPP).

- Raw text -