From:	"Steven C. Hendrickson" <hendrick AT pe DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<386BE01B DOT 858A1910 AT address DOT in DOT message DOT body>
Subject:	Re: Is DJGPP really suitable for beginners?
Lines:	27
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.3825.400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.3825.400
Message-ID:	<0m6b4.50425$Ym1.1332075@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	216.100.29.114
X-Trace:	tw11.nn.bcandid.com 946663932 216.100.29.114 (Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:12:12 MST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:12:12 MST
Organization:	bCandid - Powering the world's discussions - http://bCandid.com
Date:	Fri, 31 Dec 1999 10:07:49 -0800
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I think you can download Borland's C++ v.2 which is a very early version,
from www.inprise.com .  It might be easier for you to get set up with.  You
will have problems with current standards, because the Borland won't meet
them.

Steve Hendrickson
"Phil" <Email AT address DOT in DOT message DOT body> wrote in message
news:386BE01B DOT 858A1910 AT address DOT in DOT message DOT body...
> Hi DJGPP community,
>
> Thanks for your help with my query a week ago.
>
> I chose to try DJGPP because it stated on the homepage that it was
> suitable for beginners and seemed to be quite established, so I haven't
> looked at any other compilers yet. However, there seems to be an
> inordinate amount of 'exceptions' to previous standards, different tools
> and a lot of flexibility, which no doubt make it popular to experienced
> programmers but does tend to make it overcomplicated to the novice (or
> at least me, anyway). Does anyone know of a more basic, freeware
> compiler that I could try? Alternatively, can anyone tell me why I
> should persevere with DJGPP?
>
> Thanks again.
> Phil.
>

- Raw text -