Date:	Sun, 12 Dec 1999 14:03:01 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Peter Johnson <locke AT mcs DOT net>, Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: NT4 DPMI BUG (303h, Allocate Real-Mode Callback)--ATTN: DJ , Deloie, Shawn Hargreaves, Eli Zaretskii
In-Reply-To:	<MPG.12bbad46af52508b9896d9@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991212140216.19096U-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Peter Johnson wrote:

> >   Having several different register structs has no point as 
> > the values of the registers are only garantued inside the call !
> > (See Ralph Brown Interrupt List !)
> 
> Unfortunately we cannot use this workaround without changing how the 
> interface works (unless we just ignore the passed registers structure, 
> which would be bad form, perhaps.. comments, Eli?).

To tell the truth, I don't really understand Pierre's comment, so I
cannot comment myself.

Pierre, could you please clarify what did you refer to as ``having
several different register structs''?

- Raw text -