From:	"beat studer" <beat_studer AT freesurf DOT ch>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Size
Date:	Wed, 8 Dec 1999 21:06:01 +0100
Organization:	sunrise communications ag
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<82mdri$c49$1@news1.sunrise.ch>
References:	<XQj34.344$nx1 DOT 17835 AT wagner DOT videotron DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pop-ls-8-1-2-dialup-42.freesurf.ch
X-Trace:	news1.sunrise.ch 944683698 12425 194.230.231.42 (8 Dec 1999 20:08:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sunrise DOT ch
NNTP-Posting-Date:	8 Dec 1999 20:08:18 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
To:	djgpp AT Delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Making a final build with the -s option reduces size considerably. If you
run a program with a DOS-Shell and look at the memory (e.g.  with 'mem /c')
you'll find that only a relatively small portion is loaded into memory (e.g.
100 kb file-size vs. 17 kb in memory).

Valkir <jfd50 AT videotron DOT ca> wrote in message
news:XQj34.344$nx1 DOT 17835 AT wagner DOT videotron DOT net...
> How can I optimize my config so the size isn't that huge?
>
> Now if I do something like
>
> void main(){}
>
> it take 86k... something wrong I know :o)
>
> It does that with rhide and gcc...
>
> help me someone? thanks a lot
>
>

- Raw text -