Message-Id:	<199912030520.AAA23844@delorie.com>
From:	"Leon" <Leon AT caresystems DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: emcAsc
Date:	Fri, 3 Dec 1999 15:17:47 +1000
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Priority:	3
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> When I had my 486DX-33 with 8MB RAM, and I used OEmacs, The launch time
> is not bad at all.  It's considerably longer than Elvis or DOS EDIT, but
> it's still within the human tolerance threashhold.  And it took less
> time to launch OEmacs than to launch Windows.

elvis - a vi port? do you know if it has color syntax?

also more importantly - in comparison to others (ie emacs, elvis etc.) how
do you think vim performs in terms of RAm requierments and overall launch
spped?

I am thinking of running compiler (c++) and text editor on a _very_ simple
machine (ie 4 meg RAM old 486)

normally would definitely consider EMACS but it is just too huge for 4
megRAM i've heard...

have tried to use vim - not too bad ;-)


With best regards
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Leøn
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

- Raw text -