From:	Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	libg++ vs. libstdc++
Date:	25 Nov 1999 21:11:29 +0100
Organization:	Customer of NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<m34seal4b2.fsf@mybaby.home.felix>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	port151.bonn.ndh.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	passat.ndh.net 943560690 26971 195.94.93.151 (25 Nov 1999 20:11:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT ndh DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	25 Nov 1999 20:11:30 GMT
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.4
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

hi,

could someone please explain the relation between
gcc's g++-library and the evolving libstdc++ ?

Is libg++ 2.7.x considered a release-version ? (as opposed
to libstdc++)

then, this is from the libg++ 2.7.2 'news'-file:
* libg++ no longer builds as a standalone package; it has to be embedded
  into the libstdc++-2.8.1.1 or egcs-1.x packages.
which leads me to believe that libg++ is only the general toolkit
part of libstdc++ (the classes that aren't part of the ISO standard).
is that true ?

Since about when is the standard (ISO 14882) c++-library being developed ?

why has libg++ (lgpp*) been called "deprecated" in previous
djgpp-releases (there had been a note in the ZIP-picker) ?

thanks,
-- 
Felix Natter

- Raw text -