www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Wed, 13 Oct 1999 12:02:32 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: mktime implememtation problem |
In-Reply-To: | <3803A628.92B59B8B@earthlink.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.991013120213.16702X-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Martin Ambuhl wrote: > The standard requires of mktime that "the original values of tm_wday and > rm_yday components of the structure are ignored." I have discovered > that if I do not set these components to possibly legal values, mktime > returns (time_t)-1, meaning that it fails. Care to provide a simple example? FWIW, the sources don't show tm_wday or tm_yday being referenced at all on the right-hand side of any assignment, and I cannot do much more without a test case.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |