From:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6teles_K=E1roly?= <KOTELES AT phys DOT szote DOT u-szeged DOT hu>
Organization:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Albert_Szent-Gy=F6rgyi_Medical_Univ.?=
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 1999 20:57:21 MET
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: as problem with sections and 8 bit relative addresses
X-Confirm-Reading-To:	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6teles_K=E1roly?= <KOTELES AT phys DOT szote DOT u-szeged DOT hu>
X-pmrqc:	1
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail v3.31
Message-ID:	<F79C7F0EF1@phys.szote.u-szeged.hu>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 11 Oct 99 at 13:15, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6teles_K=E1roly?= wrote:
> 
> > 1. in functions put in a section different from ".text"
> > 2. in inline asm
> > 3. with instructions having 8 bit relative addresses (loop, jcxz)
> > The error message comes from the assembler and reads:
> > "Error: Value of .... too large for field of 1 bytes at 0x..."
> 
> This sounds like a genuine problem (bug/limitation/feature) of
> Binutils.  I suggest to post to the gnu.utils.bug news group.  Please
> include all the details (Binutils version and a clear test case--make
> it as short as you can), because the Binutils maintainer(s) will
> request them.
> 

Thank you very much for the quick reply. I try and make a minimal test 
file and send it to bug-gnu-utils. If this turns to be a bug, i'll post the 
answer here.

Thanks again!

=========================================
Koteles, Karoly
Dept. of Physiology
Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Medical University
Szeged, HUNGARY

koteles AT phys DOT szote DOT u-szeged DOT hu

- Raw text -