From:	dodger AT softhome DOT net (dodger)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: RHIDE (was: How to create a library?)
Date:	Mon, 11 Oct 1999 17:24:27 GMT
Organization:	The Matrix
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<38021bec.4003909@news.linuxfr.org>
References:	<37fbec82 DOT 15713264 AT news DOT linuxfr DOT org> <7th0q6$e2b$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu> <37fe17b2 DOT 3171963 AT news DOT linuxfr DOT org> <7tlo65$70j$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	firewall.humongous.com
X-Server-Date:	11 Oct 1999 17:21:57 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To:	djgpp AT Delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>> In principle, yes.  The IDE's (I purposefully did not use that term
>> because I meant IDE's that actually hide compiler control- not just
>> any IDE) I'm used to are Visual Basic and some Turbo/Visual C++.
>
>So you've used Borland C++.
>
>> I've tried RHIDE.  I find it to be somewhat lacking and very
>> unintuitive (for me).
>
>Why? It's just like Borland's.

I don't remember what version of TC(++?) I used (it was a looong time
ago- back in the days when my C knowledge pretty much only consisted
of printf()/scanf().  Then I moved on to Visual Basic.) but I'm pretty
sure there were a lot more menu options.  It's also been a bit since
I've tried RHIDE so I don't remember specific beefs, but I do remember
being quite frustrated at not being able to figure out (or just plain
not being able to) set up the enviroment the way I wanted it.  I like
to have more customizability than RHIDE seems to offer.

- Shawn

- Raw text -