www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | JeLlyFish DOT software AT gmx DOT net (Vinzent Hoefler) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Timer interrupt |
Date: | Tue, 17 Aug 1999 19:36:13 GMT |
Organization: | JeLlyFish software |
Message-ID: | <7pcdkd$eos$1@news04.btx.dtag.de> |
References: | <Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 990817124726 DOT 6373A-100000 AT tortugas DOT idir DOT net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | news04.btx.dtag.de 934918605 15132 777000109768-0001 990817 19:36:45 |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT t-online DOT de |
X-Sender: | 777000109768-0001 AT t-online DOT de |
X-Newsreader: | Forte Free Agent 1.11/16.235 |
Lines: | 15 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Ben Parnell <zaik AT kc DOT net> wrote: >I'm writing a program that reprograms channel 0 of the programmable timer >and hooks the timer interrupt, without passing control to the previous >handler. I was wondering if this would cause any problems with any >popular TSRs in use today. It wouldn't only cause problems with T&SRs, it would also cause more or less big trouble with DOS. The timer interrupt is used for all timing purposes, disk cache, floppy motor ... shall I continue counting? Vinzent.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |