www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | ieva01.lanet.lv: pavenis owned process doing -bs |
Date: | Sat, 14 Aug 1999 16:50:55 +0300 (WET) |
From: | Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> |
To: | Johan Venter <jventer AT writeme DOT com> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: gcc-2.95 and binutils-2.9 |
In-Reply-To: | <th3t3.5497$X4.11706@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.A41.4.05.9908141643570.31986-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Johan Venter wrote: > Quick couple of questions: > > 1. When using gcc-2.95 (binaries downloaded from simtelnet), there is a > considerable compilation slow down when compiling both c and c++ programs. More optimizations. > It seem to take ages to execute something called "collect2". collect2 is called only to link executatble and it should not take much time to execute itself. > 2. Do I need to apply the gcc-2.95 patch located on simtelnet? Can I get the > binaries already patched somewhere as the source is a 13mb download. It can be used to generate sources of DJGPP port of gcc-2.95 from original sources. So it's NOT NEEDED to use binaries and even to build gcc-2.95 from source archive (gcc295s.zip). But it will be usefull if You will want to try out development snapshots of gcc (unlikely for most users) Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |