Message-Id:	<3.0.32.19990813133839.007afec0@mail.colba.net>
X-Sender:	varobert AT mail DOT colba DOT net
X-Mailer:	Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date:	Fri, 13 Aug 1999 13:38:41 -0400
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From:	metal AT colba DOT net
Subject:	Re: Problem with GProf
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

At 01:37 PM 8/13/99 +0200, you wrote:
>In article <3 DOT 0 DOT 32 DOT 19990812190105 DOT 007a8ec0 AT mail DOT colba DOT net> you wrote:
>> I seem to have a problem with gprof: I successfully compiled my program
>> with the -pg switch, and it in turn gave me a gmon.out file which gprof
>> interpreted. The problem is that gprof tells some function called "rest"
>> took 100% of the cpu time, whereas all the other functions took 0.00
>> seconds, and 0.0% of CPU time, with a cumulative time of 0.0 seconds. 
>
>That's the telltale sign of the bug in the 'setitimer' routine in
>DJGPP 2.02. The bug is fixed in 2.03 alpha. Another cheap way of
>solving it was reported: extract the itimer.o file from DJGPP 2.01
>libc.a, and put it into the 2.02 one.

And how do I do that ? Which package should I download ? do I have to
recompile anything in DJGPP ? if so, how do I do it ?

>
>--
>Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
>Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.
>
>

- GodOfWar
There is always one more bug.

- Raw text -