Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/08/10/18:02:39
Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH] wrote:
>
> David Mitchell wrote:
>
> > Orvbongat wrote in message <19990808174528 DOT 20888 DOT 00009160 AT ng-fe1 DOT aol DOT com>...
> > >Which is one is a better IDE...Rhide or EMACS?
> > A matter of opinion really. I prefer RHIDE, because it has that familiar
> > DOS feel, but I'm sure a UNIX boffin would be scoffing at this and would be
> > able to name a thousand reasons which make emacs better.
>
> Well, as I have used both extensively, I would say that Emacs is better for
> editing code, if only for it's smart indention (which is configurable for your
> indention style). But RHIDE is much easier to setup/use [especially for users
> of Borland C++ v3.1]. And the debugging capabilities in RHIDE just kick-ass.
May I interject that Qedit, (I use the 92 version) is still the best
editor out there? It does auto-indenting based on file extension, etc.
etc. And is just sweet.
-- signed, a young old fart.
Chris
--
I know that I will never be politically correct,
and I don't give a damn about my lack of etiquette!
-- Meatloaf
- Raw text -