Date:	Sun, 8 Aug 1999 14:33:13 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	David Oppenheimer <davidopp AT megsinet DOT net>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: SV: RawHIDE
In-Reply-To:	<37AA69E3.2A1C7220@megsinet.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990808143247.23423j-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, David Oppenheimer wrote:

> in the case of RHIDE, frustrated users post frequent questions to
> which they are mostly referred to FAQ's as if the questions are
> inconsequential or bothersome

It evades me how can a reference to a specific section in the FAQ be
considered a Bad Thing, or an indication that the questions are
``bothersome''.  Whatever gave you that idea?  Armed with the section
number, it should take you no more than 5 seconds to find that section
and have the solution at your fingertips.  How can this be bad?

- Raw text -