From:	mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: unpacking .deb's
Date:	Wed, 26 May 99 15:18:54
Organization:	Fac. Wiskunde & Informatica, VU, Amsterdam
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<7igsbu$ebu@cs.vu.nl>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990526132547 DOT 12179E-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	galjas.cs.vu.nl
X-Sender:	mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl
User-Agent:	tin/pre-1.4-19990413 ("Endemoniada") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.5.1 (sun4u))
X-Poster-Key:	sha1:GTzssO6R+1AL1c0A6aUBbBxxDFI=
Cancel-Lock:	sha1:TKPewxxEmX8J47nzhir4wKIUwgY=
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 May 1999 mdruiter AT cs DOT vu DOT nl wrote:
>> ar p /SOME/DIR/PACKAGE.deb data.tar.gz | tar -zxvpf -

>> I think, with DJGPP, it is better to do this in two steps:
>> ar p /SOME/DIR/PACKAGE.deb data.tar.gz > data.tgz
>> djtarx data.tgz

>> This allows auto-filename-conversion as built into djtar.

> Why is the latter better than using the DJGPP port of GNU Tar?
> Tar implements almost the same name-conversion as DJTAR does.

Ah, I forgot that. You are right, thanks. The main remaining advantage
is not filling up %TEMP% (which might be on a RAMDISK), then.

Groente, Michel.

- Raw text -