www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Virtual memory |
Date: | Tue, 25 May 1999 22:34:49 |
Organization: | Aspen Technology, Inc. |
Lines: | 8 |
Message-ID: | <374b2589.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> |
References: | <374A042C DOT B99485C7 AT enter DOT net> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | dmcap2.aco.aspentech.com |
X-NewsEditor: | ED-1.5.8 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> I think you'd need to talk to Intel too, as far as I know each processor > has certain limitations... Every 386 or higher CPU supports 4GB (or more) of virtual memory; some earlier processors supported less physical memory due to not enough address lines. The memory limitations we are talking about are all programming (Microsoft and/or CWSDPMI) limits, not hardware limits.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |