Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/05/24/23:15:52
El día Fri, 21 May 1999 18:38:40 -0400, Sean <sproctor AT enter DOT net>
escribió:
>> >Thanks a lot. :) No, it was more like 70000 uclocks :P cause it would
>> >count up to around 0x1200 then go down to 0x10000. I'm not converting
>> >hex in my head, but I think that's around 70000. What you said worked
>> >great, thanks again.
>> 0x10000 = 65536 (I do convert hex in my head)
>>
>I meant 0x10000 + 0x1200. Do I have to do it just to prove myself?
Not really needed. Just explain better what you mean, next time.
Regards,
GUILLE
----
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (ya sabes :-)
- Raw text -