From:	"Carlos Giani_AEN2003 (M2003)" <DARKVALE AT pcc DOT tgm DOT ac DOT at>
Organization:	TGM / PCC
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 19 May 1999 16:03:00 MET-1MDT
Subject:	DJGPP-Assembler
X-Confirm-Reading-To:	"Carlos Giani_AEN2003 (M2003)" <DARKVALE AT pcc DOT tgm DOT ac DOT at>
X-pmrqc:	1
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail v3.22
Message-ID:	<275808B5EBC@pcc.tgm.ac.at>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Why does the DJGPP assembler use AT&T syntax? Why not Intel syntax?
It is useful for porting code, but not for writing new code in DOS. A 
good solution would be to support both, Intel and AT&T. It would make 
coding MUCH easier.


Carlos Rafael Giani, student of the T.G.M in Vienna

During holidays or weekends use this email-address:
darkvale AT fcmail DOT com                                

"Its not a bug, its an undocumented feature!"

- Raw text -