www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Eugene Ageenko <ageson AT cs DOT joensuu DOT fi> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Portability and size_t type related question |
Date: | Thu, 13 May 1999 13:15:13 +0300 |
Organization: | University of Joensuu / Dept. of Computer Sci. |
Lines: | 25 |
Message-ID: | <373AA630.485A105A@cs.joensuu.fi> |
References: | <Pine DOT SOL DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 9905130944050 DOT 5527-100000 AT cs DOT joensuu DOT fi> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | cspc52.joensuu.fi |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; I) |
X-Accept-Language: | ru |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Pasi Franti wrote: > > > Ok. thanx. it is like here then: > > > > typedef unsigned short U16; > > typedef unsigned long U32; > > typedef unsigned char BYTE; > > I disagree. > > I did not follow your discussion but how did you come up to such > exactly. I have said that I have defined new types in our software (like it is done in some modules already. see coder source code for example) the definitions now in a one place and it is easy to find them and change in a different system. No wonder I come to problem, if was pushed to use standard types. ;) Eugene
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |