Message-ID:	<372ADFC7.D9D67D4A@mbox2.singnet.com.sg>
Date:	Sat, 01 May 1999 19:04:39 +0800
From:	"| õ¿õ | õ¿õ | õ¿õ | õ¿õ |" <cdman AT mbox2 DOT singnet DOT com DOT sg>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.03 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Too big code
References:	<7ei8dv$28fo$1 AT ns DOT felk DOT cvut DOT cz> <370cf5d4 DOT 0 AT energise DOT enta DOT net>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I know that this email may be a bit old. But i have some question to ask u.
Hoped that u can help. is there any other option beside -s ??? where can i find
information abt other complier option??

James Bunting wrote:

> You could try the -s compiler option.  If you are using RHIDE it is simply a
> matter of going to "Options/Compiler Options" and typing in "-s" (no
> quotes).  This should reduce the size of your executable.
>
> Michal Strelec <strelec AT adam DOT osu DOT cz> wrote in message
> news:7ei8dv$28fo$1 AT ns DOT felk DOT cvut DOT cz...
> > Hi
> > I have a question:
> > I tried to compile with dj small programs (classical Hello.c) and output
> > file hello.exe was BIG (130kB). Hello.c uses (I suppose) standart lib
> > libgcc.a.
> > Next I tried to compile it with bc3.1 and output file was SMALL (6kB).
> > Next I have found in gnu archieve (gpcXX.zip) I took libgcc.a and
> overwrite
> > the previous one. After compilation file was 70kB.
> >
> > Can you tell me how to minimize size of the output code? I use only few
> > standard functions.
> >
> > PS: I also found that BC has small libraries. But it has strange names and
> I
> > don't know what functions are included.
> >
> > Thanx Michal
> >
> >

- Raw text -