Date:	Wed, 28 Apr 1999 10:27:29 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Michael Bukin <M DOT A DOT Bukin AT inp DOT nsk DOT su>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Windows trashes my 800x600 graphics mode program
In-Reply-To:	<20zp3uqcyc.fsf@Sky.inp.nsk.su>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990428102641.25283Q-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 27 Apr 1999, Michael Bukin wrote:

> Int 0x2F4001 and Int 0x2F4002 can be captured with both real-mode and
> protected mode handlers, but program should issue Int 0x2F4000 first.
> It seems that switching between applications does not work well after
> enabling these interrupts, or perhaps Windows expects some action when
> it sends those interrupts.

Could you please describe these adverse effects on application switching?

- Raw text -