Message-Id:	<3.0.6.32.19990426040555.007a9b90@dragonbbs.com>
X-Sender:	db6646 AT dragonbbs DOT com (Unverified)
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date:	Mon, 26 Apr 1999 04:05:55 -0700
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From:	Daniel Pierce <db6646 AT dragonbbs DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Another reason for DOS/FreeDOS/DOS32, etc.
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SOL.3.91.990424164923.5991A-100000@travelers.mail.cor
	nell.edu>
References:	<199904240405 DOT AAA27075 AT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I have found a mulitasking MS-Dos compatible operating system!

It's at http://nanosft.com/products/multidos.html

It's shareware and downloadable.

I haven't read all the fine print in the manual so don't flame me if it
ain't really usefull.
Does say that it runs 64 .exe/.com tasks at a time and has messages and
semaphores.

Now to try it with DJGPP.......








At 04:56 PM 4/24/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Daniel Pierce said:
>
>> I think we really need a multi-tasking DOS.
>
>Agreed.
>
>> I would like a Linux-like OS but Linux is overkill. I am trying it with a
>> 300 meg drive and have found difficulty in taking out the un-needed network
>> & emacs type stuff.  X-windows is way too much bloat just to display a few
>> jpeg images. Progress IS being made though.
>
>Have you taken a look at PicoBSD?  It fits on a floppy.  It might still 
>be overkill in features (multiuser? security?), but it sure is tiny, and 
>multitasking, and 32 bit.
>
>http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/picobsd.html
>

- Raw text -