Message-Id:	<3.0.6.32.19990212164718.0081b960@pop.netaddress.com>
X-Sender:	pderbysh AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:47:18 -0500
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From:	Paul Derbyshire <pderbysh AT usa DOT net>
Subject:	Re-entrancy questions.
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Is the DJGPP 'new' thread-safe already, or should someone developing a
threading library for DJGPP wrap 'new' to be thread-safe?

Is the GCC 'new' thread-safe on all systems with system level support for
multitasking and multithreading?

Is the same true for delete, malloc, and free?

What is the re-entrancy situation with other standard C library functions,
and with the STL and iostreams? (Both for DJGPP and other GCC deployments.)

-- 
   .*.  "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not
-()  <  circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a
   `*'  straight line."    -------------------------------------------------
        -- B. Mandelbrot  |http://surf.to/pgd.net
_____________________ ____|________     Paul Derbyshire     pderbysh AT usa DOT net
Programmer & Humanist|ICQ: 10423848|

- Raw text -