From:	khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Templates, namespaces
Date:	29 Jan 1999 23:09:48 GMT
Organization:	Center for X-ray Lithography, UW-Madison
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<78tf3s$s2k$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990128162725 DOT 29318B-100000 AT is> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990129173547 DOT 008383b0 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modi.xraylith.wisc.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990129173547 DOT 008383b0 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com>,
Paul Derbyshire  <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>At 06:55 PM 1/28/99 GMT, you wrote:
>
>A year ago I seem to recall someone saying they'd get gcc/egcs up to being
>reasonably compatible with ANSI C++ in a year...which has now elapsed. Has
>somebody been reneging?

You do know that a large percentage of GCC development is done by
unpaid volunteers, right? 

The C++ language conformance in EGCS is better than 90% of the commercial
offerings right now. The standard library, and the sore spot ;-), is 
being worked on. 

To be quite honest, I'm beginning to smell a troll here.

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -