Message-ID:	<36ACB663.20DFE30B@home.com>
From:	Mark & Candice White <mhewii AT home DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	libggc vers libc?
Lines:	11
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 18:22:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.0.127.127
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT home DOT net
X-Trace:	news.rdc1.mi.home.com 917288531 24.0.127.127 (Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:22:11 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:22:11 PDT
Organization:	@Home Network
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

What is the nature of the functions in libgcc verses libc?

I read in the history area on the DJGPP page that the
original idea of porting gcc to DOS was to have a
i386/DOS hosted  compiler to write a i386 32 bit OS.
With this in mind is it likely that libgcc is the OS calling
layer of libc, meaning if I replace it with similar calls
to my OS I will not have to write a whole libc?
If this is true where can I find a list of the called functions
and there intended purpose?

- Raw text -