Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 1999 19:27:50 -0500 (EST)
From:	Daniel Reed <djr AT narnia DOT n DOT ml DOT org>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: djgpp (dos) preproccessor directive
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990119114308.12893L-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.05.9901191925200.29231-100000@narnia.n.ml.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
) On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, Daniel Reed wrote:
) > However, GCC will always #define unix when compiling under Linux/etc.*, so
) This won't work, because DJGPP defines `unix' as well (there are good
) reasons why it does so, btw).
) 
) It is generally a good idea to test your suggestions before posting
) them, or at least to mention that they are untested.  Otherwise, you
) risk to confuse the confused.
My apologies for spreading misinformation. However, the primary intent of
my message was to bring up the possibility of the remove() call. I did a
quick check of what cpp -dM produced on my Linux box to see if there was
anything OS-specific, saw unix (and linux), and thought I might mention
it.

-- 
Daniel Reed <n AT ml DOT org>
Windows - brought to you by the makers of EdLin...

- Raw text -