From:	Michael Schuster <schuster AT eev DOT e-technik DOT uni-erlangen DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: string class
Date:	Fri, 27 Nov 1998 07:33:02 GMT
Organization:	Regionales Rechenzentrum Erlangen, Germany
Lines:	37
Message-ID:	<19981127.7330233@eev6.eev>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 981126094447 DOT 14160D-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	eev6.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-Newsreader:	Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.0; WinNT/Win95)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id JAB07415
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ursprüngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Am 26.11.98, 08:45:52, schrieb Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> zum 
Thema Re: string class:

> It's already in the FAQ.  Here's an excerpt:
(...)
> Granted, the above doesn't mention the String class explicitly, but I
> don't think it is reasonable to expect the FAQ to mention every
> possible case of such problems.  After all, a FAQ is not a Knowledge
> Base (even though the DJGPP FAQ sometimes looks like one ;-).


well, in order to look for "inline" problems you will have to know 
that it is such a problem-
I didnot think about looking the header files for "Is it inline?" If I 
knew that I could help myself.
Anyway, gxx.exe should make the compiling for c++ users easier, so why 
doesn't gxx does this inline - expanding.
Also djgpp version 2.7.xx worked without -O.
Additionally does it mean, when declaring something as inline and 
don't use the -O option this prog won't compile???

Just thinking....

Gruesse 
Michi

- Raw text -