Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 1998 11:59:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id:	<199811091659.LAA03061@indy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<36466615.E35B7224@cartsys.com> (message from Nate Eldredge on
	Sun, 08 Nov 1998 19:48:37 -0800)
Subject:	Re: List header munging [Possibly OT] [Was: Graphics in C]
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> But I'd like to take this opportunity to ask how people feel about the
> new feature of the listserv that makes the "Reply-To" address
> <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>.

Before I did that, people were complaining that their default
"reply-to" didn't work because of all the anti-spam addresses.  Plus,
some threads were getting huge CC lists, and for some people (like me)
mailing list mail goes into a different bucket than private mail, so
these threads pollute my private bucket even when the mail isn't
directed at me personally.

- Raw text -