Message-Id:	<199811041554.PAA16025@relay.clara.net>
From:	"Arthur" <arfa AT clara DOT net>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Allegro: Voice being cut off
Date:	Wed, 4 Nov 1998 15:48:58 -0000
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<MPG.10aa6a1fb014a92c9897fe@news.freeserve.net>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> In comp.os.msdos.djgpp, article <199811032320 DOT XAA25959 AT relay DOT clara DOT net>,
> Arthur (arfa AT clara DOT net) wrote:
> > Suggest you get the latest Work In Progress (WIP) of Allegro
> (Oct 25). In
> > previous versions, the default priority was also 255, so
> setting priority
> > 255 on any sample wouldn't make a difference, unless you set any other
> > samples to a lower priority. The new version has the default
> priority set to
> > 128. You can fix your problem by setting your samples to a
> lower priority,
> > but I would still get the WIP because it also supports 16-bit
> interpolation
> > on the sound, which is really cool (older versions only
> supported 8-bit with
> > no mixing).
>
> I prefer to use 'final' versions of Allegro instead of WIPs, so I'll
> check out changing the priority on the other samples. Does anony have any
> idea when Allegro 3.1 will be out?

Next few months. If you're worrying about incompatibilities with your code,
or bugs in the new WIP, then don't worry. The Oct25 WIP is quite safe, and
is a real step up from Allegro 3.0.  There are a few more touches to the
latest version (for instance, MMX code, and someone's written faster sprite
scaling/rotation code) before the next "full" version is released.

James Arthur
jaa AT arfa DOT clara DOT net
ICQ#15054819

- Raw text -