Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/11/04/08:45:29
From: | arganoid AT fatal-design DOT com (Andrew R. Gillett)
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | RE: Allegro: Voice being cut off
|
Date: | Wed, 4 Nov 1998 13:42:28 -0000
|
Organization: | Customer of Planet Online
|
Lines: | 19
|
Message-ID: | <MPG.10aa6a1fb014a92c9897fe@news.freeserve.net>
|
References: | <199811032320 DOT XAA25959 AT relay DOT clara DOT net>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | modem-14.arsenic.dialup.pol.co.uk
|
X-Trace: | newsreader4.core.theplanet.net 910186971 1665 62.136.16.14 (4 Nov 1998 13:42:51 GMT)
|
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 4 Nov 1998 13:42:51 GMT
|
X-Newsreader: | MicroPlanet Gravity v2.10
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
In comp.os.msdos.djgpp, article <199811032320 DOT XAA25959 AT relay DOT clara DOT net>,
Arthur (arfa AT clara DOT net) wrote:
> Suggest you get the latest Work In Progress (WIP) of Allegro (Oct 25). In
> previous versions, the default priority was also 255, so setting priority
> 255 on any sample wouldn't make a difference, unless you set any other
> samples to a lower priority. The new version has the default priority set to
> 128. You can fix your problem by setting your samples to a lower priority,
> but I would still get the WIP because it also supports 16-bit interpolation
> on the sound, which is really cool (older versions only supported 8-bit with
> no mixing).
I prefer to use 'final' versions of Allegro instead of WIPs, so I'll
check out changing the priority on the other samples. Does anony have any
idea when Allegro 3.1 will be out?
--
Andrew Gillett
http://argnet.fatal-design.com/
ICQ: 12142937
- Raw text -