Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/10/23/11:18:44
Boon van der RJ wrote:
>
> So bottom line is: I don't think there will be a problem with such an
> approach (not even taking into acount the unlikeliness of the tree set
> up and use of it described above)
I did some more testing, and found that the makefiles i'm working on did
indeed break.
unfortunately, I have the line:
cd ../slang/src; $(MAKE)
to get DOS command.com to work, I need to
cd ../../src to get back to the original directory. If bash has already
returned, this line fails.
I guess I can do it with a ../slang/makefile that then calls
src/makefile and back out of
the nested directories one by one.
Or, just have a makefile.dos that will work with command.com. I've
already had to do a number of hacks. For instance, the original package
has a make.common include file that gets sliced down by pkunzip on a 8.3
system to the unfortunately named 'make.com'.
- Raw text -