From:	"Get'Fix" <mnemonic AT discover DOT co DOT za>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Speed difference DOS / Win95 ???
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 1998 23:22:12 +0200
Organization:	The South African Internet Exchange
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<709mp0$t35$1@news2.saix.net>
References:	<6vtgfb$6h6$1 AT news2 DOT saix DOT net> <19981012231107 DOT 17684 DOT 00000414 AT ng149 DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	arizona.discover.co.za
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Compwiz826 wrote in message <19981012231107 DOT 17684 DOT 00000414 AT ng149 DOT aol DOT com>...
>
>well the reason some actions work better from win95 is that it has bulit in
>cache..... For dos to have a similar effect u are going to have to use
>SMARTDRV. u have to place it in autoexec.bat


Nope, that's not it since I run both cache in Win95 and DOS and specifically
pause in the program so that the cache gets enough time to flush out to
disk. It's definately not the disk cache :(

I always use smartdrv even in Win95 and never had eny problems, maybe I'm
lucky so far... besides, compiling without disk cache is a real pain
sometimes...

- Raw text -