Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/09/03/14:06:19
Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com> wrote:
> Endlisnis wrote:
> > While were
> > on this topic, if "-gstabs+" is so much better, than why isn't it used by
> > default by RHIDE?
>
> Probably because `symify' and the tiny debuggers don't understand stabs
> at present.
True, you'll need gsymify or RHIDE to analize an stack trace from a C++
program.
> So stabs could get in your way if your program crashes.
> (The traceback in conjunction with the `addr2line' tool could help,
> though.)
Additionally RHIDE uses -g alone because:
1) gcc 2.7.2.x for djgpp doesn't support stabs.
2) -gX generates much bigger exes.
I use -gstabs3, no -gstabs+ because the difference in size is important.
SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013
- Raw text -