Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/07/10/18:11:03
Erik Max Francis wrote:
> Ronald Patixo G wrote:
>
> > I don't understand why he uses this formula
> >
> > ang_rad = ang * TWOPIDIV360 ;
> > insted of the one i'm using
> >
> > and why he says that 1920 is equivalent to 360
>
> It looks like he's simply using a different degree unit. Instead of
> using units of 1 deg, like you are, he wants higher resolution and is
> using units of 360/1920 deg = 0.1875 deg.
>
Is the formula (unsing units of 360/1920 deg = 0.1875 deg)
radian = ang * ((2*PI)/1920) ;
equivalent to (using 1 deg)
radian = ang *(PI/180)
for converting from deg to rad
How can i find a relation between the trig fuctions calculated using
0.1875 deg and trig functions unsing 1 deg
- Raw text -