From:	"John R." <jjrtch AT osfmail DOT isc DOT rit DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<00ac01bda38e$578d3f40$364e08c3 AT arthur>
Subject:	Re: Is Allegro up to speed?
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 1998 09:21:11 +0100
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<NZjl#D.7MC@csh-newsserver.csh.rit.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mcp.csh.rit.edu
Organization:	Rochester Institute of Technology
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>I disagree. I refer you to a certain game - you've probably never heard of
>it - called Quake. And there are others - look for all the games which
>require CWSDPMI in their runtime directory. And DOS is far more efficient
at
>what it does than Win 95.

I agree... As long as certain OSes still run dos programs, its not dead. And
beyond that, Allegro is portable to linux or atleast somewhat portable (or
atleast from my understanding they plan it to be...) , and linux isn't dead.

johnr

- Raw text -