Message-ID:	<3597857C.5A274035@compmore.net>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 1998 08:15:56 -0400
From:	stdenis <stdenis AT compmore DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: portable code
References:	<35966659 DOT 4760AC58 AT compmore DOT net> <35971A4C DOT 9F4F0343 AT cartsys DOT com>

> However, it's been my experience that the real portability problems are
> not in the language (which these try to catch), but in the library.
> E.g. some systems return different values from `sprintf', the flags for
> `access' are sometimes missing, etc, etc.  This there currently isn't
> much you can do about automatically, but there's a project in the works
> to include some info on portability in the DJGPP docs.

Wouldn't that mean that the other system is not ANSI C?

tom

- Raw text -