From:	qballlives AT aol DOT com (QBallLives)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: portable code
Lines:	50
Message-ID:	<1998062904064500.AAA21677@ladder01.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ladder01.news.aol.com
Date:	29 Jun 1998 04:06:45 GMT
Organization:	AOL http://www.aol.com
References:	<35966659 DOT 4760AC58 AT compmore DOT net>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

>What is the safest way to make portable code?
>
>Would this be ok?
>
>-pendatic -ansi -Wall
>
>
>(also is it -Wall or -wall)?
>tom
>
>

it's -Wall  .. .but it could be -wall

I always type -Wall

after all,

all in all,

are we are is just a

a 

nuther brick in the wall


-ansi (this flag does not matter in the portability sense)

-pendatic  ( do you mean pedantic? I think that just gives a verbose reporting
of whatever )

None is these flags to my knowledge make code more "portable" ... 

- but you've come to the right place, because this thread can only go 2 ways

#1, I am flamed for days on end...

#2 somebody who KNOWS WHAT THEY"RE TALKING ABOUT (unlike me) helps you out
bigtime (this happens alot around here)

Anyways, good luck

.. and what other OS is there?


Jim the loiterer
aloiterer AT juno DOT com
http://members.xoom.com/JimMcCue/index.htm
(Jim the loiterer's PC games, programming, & stuff...)

- Raw text -