Sender:	nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID:	<3589BAAB.26E031BF@cartsys.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 1998 18:11:07 -0700
From:	Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Elliott Oti <oti AT phys DOT uu DOT nl>
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: C vs C++
References:	<199806152230390650 DOT 001F6C6E AT pogwizd DOT tcs DOT uni DOT wroc DOT pl> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 980617120739 DOT 17286B-100000 AT ruunat DOT phys DOT uu DOT nl>

Elliott Oti wrote:

> For class methods declared and defined in a header file gcc will (usually)
> optimize such an expression, so that it winds up being as efficient as C
> code generated with the usual ADD_MATRIX(a,b) macro approach. 

Note that with GCC, you can do inline functions in vanilla C as well. 
They're safer, more convenient, and usually as fast as macros.

-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com

- Raw text -