Message-Id:	<m0ymJLb-000S4BC@inti.gov.ar>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From:	"Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization:	INTI
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, Zoey4Pres <zoey4pres AT aol DOT com>,
	djgpp AT delorie DOT com, Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 1998 11:42:48 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: NULL redefined in djgpp headers
CC:	dj AT delorie DOT com
References:	<m0ymH9K-000S3nC AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.980617162616.20468A-100000@is>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:

> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
> 
> > 3) Why a correction? the fault is in the djgpp headers, we must check before 
> > defining NULL, or not?
> 
> I think it should be corrected.  Telling users to edit their system 
> headers is IMHO a bad idea.  It doesn't matter to me where's the 
> correction as long as the problem is solved.  Since DJ objects to 
> changing the headers in %DJDIR%/include, let's change the C++ headers.

I don't think is a good idea to correct the GNU headers. Why DJ doesn't want to 
correct the libc headers? 
IMHO is a very bad idea to define NULL without checking or using undef first.

SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013

- Raw text -