From:	sl AT psycode DOT com DOT NOSPAM (Gili)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: AT&T assembler
Date:	8 Jun 1998 12:26:33 GMT
Organization:	All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<bWLoegW7sFse-pn2-3vGQ81oLO3Bq@portC31.Generation.NET>
References:	<bWLoegW7sFse-pn2-iuli5Rxd4EUT AT portF03 DOT Generation DOT NET> <6ld6hl$bk0 AT dfw-ixnews4 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <bWLoegW7sFse-pn2-8PpEYeQWERrR AT portD35 DOT Generation DOT NET> <357bb477 DOT 2127675 AT news DOT dlc DOT fi>
Reply-To:	sl AT psycode DOT com DOT NOSPAM
NNTP-Posting-Host:	205.205.118.187
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

On Mon, 8 Jun 1998 09:55:45, yorka AT dlc DOT fi (aYk) wrote:

> >	How about inport().. Is that the same?
> >
> 
> You mean inportb(). You have to specify the transfer size. And you
> need to include dos.h instead of pc.h if I remember correctly.

	But is inportb() the same as inp()?

Gili

-----Putting the Cow in Cow_woC

- Raw text -