From:	"Martin Ambuhl" <mambuhl AT tiac DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gets
Date:	Sun, 24 May 1998 01:21:57 -0400
Organization:	Nocturnal Aviation
Lines:	40
Message-ID:	<6k8aft$ha1@news-central.tiac.net>
References:	<1998052404332600 DOT AAA20938 AT ladder03 DOT news DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	p15.tc2.newyo.ny.tiac.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Peleg79593 wrote in message
<1998052404332600 DOT AAA20938 AT ladder03 DOT news DOT aol DOT com>...
:Okay, so I want to use
:
:gets(x);
========
No, you don't.
Use fgets(x, sizeof x, stdin); /* for staticly allocated x */
 or with the size_t argument otherwise specified.
========
:
:instead of scanf in a bunch of input functions. So I replace all the scanfs.
:But, then, the program just skips past the gets(x) without accepting any
input
:as though there were something still in the buffer.  So I add fflush(stdin)
========
Don't invoke undefined behavior.  fflush is defined for output streams,
not input files, even in GCC.
========
:before and after all of my buffered inputs.  Same problem.  So, then, I put:
:
:gets(trash);
:
:before every
:
:gets(x);
:
:and, voila, it works.  What gives here?  Am I doing something wrong, or is
this
:an acceptable way to clear the buffer?
======
Post the real code.  Your description makes it sound like
you have misdiagnosed the problem.
======
:
:
:

- Raw text -