www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/05/13/10:50:14

Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 12:03:45 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Joseph Sany Kalapurakal <gt8319a AT prism DOT gatech DOT edu>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: WATCOM or DJGPP
In-Reply-To: <199805122023.QAA05510@acmey.gatech.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980513120253.26082O-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Tue, 12 May 1998, Joseph Sany Kalapurakal wrote:

> I am trying to make a 3d engine which needs bottleneck speed. Which
> compiler would be better (WATCOM c++ 11.0 or DJGPP 2.8). I read somewhere
> that DJGPP and WATCOM are almost the same in optimization( except for
> pentium optimizations which PCGPC took care of). Just want to
> make sure if that's true.Thanks in advance.

The difference was small, and only visible on the Pentium.  Now, with GCC 
2.8.x and PGCC, that difference is gone, AFAIK.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019