From:	"Andrew Crabtree" <andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: PCGCC OR GCC (which one is faster)
Date:	Tue, 12 May 1998 09:53:11 -0700
Organization:	Hewlett-Packard, Roseville
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<6j9upg$23d$1@rosenews.rose.hp.com>
References:	<19980512032838 DOT AAJ16211 AT ppp127 DOT cartsys DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ros51675cra.rose.hp.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Nate Eldredge wrote in message
<19980512032838 DOT AAJ16211 AT ppp127 DOT cartsys DOT com>...
>>Joseph Sany Kalapurakal wrote:
>>For 486 users GCC
>>2.8 is definitely faster.
>Have you actually tried it?
I doubt it.  Perhaps he meant to say that pentium optimized code runs slower
on a 486 sometimes.
But pgcc can optimize and target 486, pentium, pentium pro/pII, k5, k6, and
cyrix m?.  PGCC optimizing for a 486 should beat out stock gcc everytime.

Andy

- Raw text -