From:	bpaddock AT csonline DOT net (Bob Paddock)
To:	robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Can't Get GCC 2.8.0 to build?
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:31:55 -0500
Organization:	is mostly via piles
Reply-To:	bpaddock AT csonline DOT net
Message-ID:	<LTtF1UQy8gwJ092yn@csonline.net>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980323132438 DOT 1968L-100000 AT is>
	<4fkF1UQy8cQE092yn AT csonline DOT net> <3516A64D DOT 6AD29182 AT gmx DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<3516A64D.6AD29182@gmx.net>
Lines:	21

>> I still think I'm missing some thing as I don't see any
>> thing that fixes the files names to end with .exe in the
>> "install" section of the makefile nor any other scripts that
>> would fix them.
[snip]
>with a Makefile disigned for unix will fail to 99.99%
>on DJGPP when not running under W95 with long filenames
>enabled. (at least for not trivial packages like gcc)

I am running with W95 with long filenames enabled.  Does this
change what I need to do to install the compiler from a
source build?


>To get a clue, where to install what, run
>make install -n
>and watch the output.

Thanks will do.

Does it matter if I do "make install -n" or "sh djmake.sh -n"?

- Raw text -