From:	"matthew p. conte" <spam AT somebody DOT else>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: djgpp 2.1?
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 1998 07:56:51 -0500
Organization:	little, if any
Lines:	28
Message-ID:	<6ch9uh$f8c@dfw-ixnews9.ix.netcom.com>
References:	<6cdhr4$ae6 AT dfw-ixnews3 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <34EB8FDE DOT 59E8 AT cs DOT com>
Reply-To:	"matthew p. conte" <dont AT bother DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	alb-ny6-34.ix.netcom.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

John M. Aldrich wrote in message <34EB8FDE DOT 59E8 AT cs DOT com>...

>In the current DJGPP version (2.01), the DJGPP macro is set to 2 and
>DJGPP_MINOR is set to 1.  It seems to me that this could lead to serious
>ambiguities should v2.x ever creep above .09.  However, at least at
>present, when you see someone referring to 2.1, they mean 2.01.


ok, thanks.

>Oh, and disguising your email address when asking for information is
>very impolite.

loads and loads of spam is extra-impolite.  i'm not playing that game
anymore.  i asked for help in the newsgroups, a valid e-mail address is not
required for a USENET reply.  perhaps your rules of netiquette should be
revised due to the spam outbreak.

sorry, i've got better things to do that sift through my inbox all day,
lengthening my already obscenely long killfile.

matthew.
   _  _ ____________________________ _  _
  matt.conte [bill DOT clinton AT whitehouse DOT gov]
  Nofrendo - NES Emulator for DOS || broke
  -- [http://spam.is.ruling.the/~world] --

- Raw text -