Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/02/06/18:00:56
Reinier Heeres wrote:
> I have the idea that DJGPP isnt't inlining my hline routine in my
> program, but I have defined it like this:
>....
You can find out for definite by asking gcc to tell you:
-Winline
will warn about any functions declared inline which can't be inlined.
Reasons that come to mind include:
* Recursive use. I think that if a function calls itself, then the
recursive calls are not surprisingly not inlined
* Something redefining the token "inline" to nothing.
* Invoking the function before its definition.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Ashley K DOT Ashley AT Ulcc DOT ac DOT uk
Special Projects Manager
http://www.ulcc.ac.uk/staff/Kevin+Ashley
ULCC ...ukc!ncdlab!K.Ashley (but probably not any
more)
This is not a signature
imes +/- 0, to represent infinitesimal
underflow). The IEEE floating-point standard requires this. As far
as I recall (and I'm no Intel assembler programmer) the x86 architecture
also supports this, but there are mode bits to tell the CPU whether to
cause an exception on overflow/ divide by 0/ etc or whether to return
results like +INF.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Ashley K DOT Ashley AT Ulcc DOT ac DOT uk
Special Projects Manager
http://www.ulcc.ac.uk/staff/Kevin+Ashley
ULCC ...ukc!ncdlab!K.Ashley (but probably not any
more)
This is not a signature
- Raw text -