Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/01/28/05:00:41
On 28 Jan 1998 02:17:43 GMT in comp.os.msdos.djgpp Jean-Luc Romano
<jromano AT teton DOT Mines DOT EDU> wrote:
: Hey! Thanks for answering! If you don't mind, I have two more
: questions:
: 1.) I want to prevent the behavior that makes a program run too
: fast on a fast computer (but I still want the program to run
: slow on a slow computer).
: I figure I can do that by timing the event loops so they
: run a set number of times a second. My first question is:
: What is the suggested minimum number of frames to blit to
: the screen per second? (I use the allegro library.)
: Is ten times per second too slow?
It'll look a little jerky. Try it and see -- and see whether or not
different computers can handle it for your game.
[snip]
: The above code increments global_ticks once every millisecond
: (1000 times a second). My second question is: if I wanted to
: display, say, a maximum of 10 frames to my screen every second,
: would implementing the following code be suggested?
: BITMAP *buffer;
: while(1) /* Event loop */
: {
: /* code executed every event loop */
: .
: .
: .
: while (global_ticks < 100){} /* if one tenth of a second
: hasn't elapsed yet, do
: nothing until one tenth of
: a second has elapsed. */
: global_ticks = 0; /* reset the global_ticks for next time
: through the event loop */
: /* blit the buffer to the screen like so: */
: blit(buffer, screen, 0, 0, 0, 0, SCREEN_W, SCREEN_H);
: }
That would work for what you want, yes. I'd avoid resetting a
variable called `global_*' though -- the idea was that it would be a
count of how many ticks the game had been running for. Such variables
can be quite useful, if for example you need to schedule something to
happen later on, or know when something happened exactly.
How about using a second variable, last_frame_time, which you set to
global_ticks just before blitting (and zero initially), and change the
while loop condition to (global_ticks - last_frame_time < 100)?
In general I prefer a game to run at the same speed even on slow
computers that can't handle the frame rate, in which case you need to
rearrange the while loop a bit and add 100 to last_frame_time instead
of setting it to exactly global_ticks; but you said you wanted it to
run slowly on slower computers.
: Is this an efficient way to prevent the speed-up of my game on
: faster computers, or is there a better way?
I don't think `efficient' is really the right term to use for a delay
loop ;). You might consider calling __dpmi_yield in the loop, which
would let background tasks the OS is performing continue, but this is
probably undesirable in a game.
--
george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk
- Raw text -