From:	Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: binutils 2.8.1 performance = slow
Date:	Wed, 26 Nov 1997 17:27:09 -0500
Organization:	Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines:	12
Message-ID:	<347CA23D.5E3C@cam.org>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 971126132246 DOT 960H-100000 AT is> <347C86AC DOT 7AAC AT seanet DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dynppp-199.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

Alan M. Doerhoefer wrote:
> Indeed, since I only compared the performance using one (large)
> program, I don't think that's a very good measure of the overall
> speed of 2.8.1. I was surprised enough to inquire if anyone else
> had seen this sort of thing, but I will now study this in depth
> and report back.
Yes, me. A while back Thomas Djafari posted a program for comparing
Watcom and DJGPP. With pentium optimisations (-O6 -mpentium
-funroll-loops -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer) on a P133 16 MB RAM.
Same slowdown with Binutils 2.8.1
-- 
--> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <--

- Raw text -