Mail Archives: djgpp/1997/11/25/10:46:10
On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, Christopher Croughton wrote:
> This is because it would somehow merge
> duplicate definitions, yes? So if you said "int x; int x;" it would
> merge tham and then generate code to destroy 'x' twice?
Yes.
> does any other C++ compiler have this problem?
I have no idea. I try to stay away of C++ as much as I can. Maybe other
compilers just let you fail if you define the same object twice?
> In the meantime, it sounds as though compressing the executable is the
> answer. Or are there problems with that as well?
Not that I know of. But then I'm not that excited about the size of the
.exe files I get ;-).
- Raw text -