Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 1997 13:57:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id:	<1.5.4.16.19970929233024.3427ad9e@giasbga.vsnl.net.in>
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
From:	Chirayu Krishnappa <chirayu AT radiolink DOT net>
Subject:	Re: far pointers
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

>ends up inside an exception handler set up by the extender.  When this
>happens, the extender can do whatever it pleases; in particular, it
>could change the address and move the data on behalf of the

Thanx a lot. Protected mode appears _very_ flexible. I guess there would be
too much overhead with this exception handling (mayeb more than __dpmi_int).
Maybe Watcom does t that way. We'll leave it at this. 

And a suggestion, how about writing "the _dos_ds() function" (note the
function call brackets) instead of "_dos_ds () remeber its a function". The
() at the end of the name somehow registers a _lot_ better than the mention
that its actually a function. Just a suggestion.

Bye,

Chirayu Krishnappa:
------------------
e-mail: chirayu AT radiolink DOT net or ruby AT radiolink DOT net
Phone:  91 080 3332616.

- Raw text -